Six-week project sprints that pair students from schools in different states
TL;DR Twinclass runs six-week project sprints in which mixed teams from two schools in different states tackle one shared local problem, such as heat, water or waste. Teachers moderate everything and the sprint ends in a public showcase. Private schools pay per student, and CSR funders sponsor government partner schools.
Indian students do a lot of projects, but almost always with their own classmates. Collaboration across schools happens mainly through competitions. Smart India Hackathon has drawn more than 18 lakh participating students, all from colleges and universities[1]. NITI Aayog's Atal Tinkering Labs now number 10,000 across 722 districts[2], and their events are mostly contests between school teams.
The Economic Survey 2025-26 says school timetables need room for hands-on, project-based work and encourages an annual fair to show students' projects[3]. Yet how many students ever work with someone whose school, language and town differ from theirs? Very few, and that's exactly the setting most of them will work in later.
What it does, in regulatory terms: a supervised school programme handling children's data. Twinclass collects only what schools need, gets verifiable parental consent under the DPDP Rules[4], and allows no private messaging between children.
Each sprint pairs two schools, often one private and one government school, from different states. Teams of six, three from each school, pick one question from a shared theme, for example how to cut heat in classrooms. Over six weeks they gather local data, meet twice a week in a moderated online room, compare what they found in each town and build a small solution or proposal. Teachers from both schools run the sessions using Twinclass's weekly plans and rubrics. The sprint ends with an online showcase judged by outside mentors.
The seed pitched global student collaboration, and I've pulled it closer to home. Pairing across countries runs into time zones, child-safety rules and parents' doubts, and global nonprofit school networks already link schools in more than 140 countries[5]. Starting within India keeps schedules aligned and still puts students with peers from a different state.
Students and teachers use it. Private schools pay a fee per student per sprint, which is my assumption to test, and they can show the work to parents and in inspections. CSR funders pay for government partner schools, which also gives private schools a reason to join. I found no public price for inter-school project programmes in India.
The DPDP Rules notified on 14 November 2025 set out how to collect parental consent for children's data[4], so a careful vendor can now design to a known standard. The Economic Survey's call for more project time in school timetables gives principals a policy reason to buy[3].
I found no public figure for spending on inter-school collaboration. The narrowest signal is that 10,000 Atal Tinkering Labs already run project work in schools[2]. The adjacent number - private schools make up 26% of India's 14.71 lakh schools and 41% of enrolment[6]. That's the pool of possible paying schools, not your market.
The largest of those networks has run teacher-led global projects since 1988 and claims more than 30,000 member schools and youth groups[5]. Smart India Hackathon serves college students[1], and ATL events serve school teams[2]. None of them sells Indian schools a structured, moderated programme that mixes teams across schools and states. That's the gap, and honestly it's an operations gap more than a software one.
| Difficulty | Moderate (40/100) |
| Starting capital | ₹35–70 L |
| Time to launch | 4–6 months |
The software can start simple. The hard work is coordination, which means matching schools whose timetables, exam dates and holidays line up, keeping teachers on both sides committed and moderating every interaction between minors. Sales are seasonal and principals need proof before paying.
No licence to run the programme, but children's data and safety bring firm duties.
Building this outside India? The categories above usually have a local equivalent, so check with your own regulator.
Don't let AI be the only moderator between minors, or grade students on its own. A teacher stays in every session.
Want to work out the AI layer for Twinclass? Talk to Yash →
I'd back a founder from school programmes or education nonprofits who's good at operations and at building trust with principals. If you want a pure software company then skip this one. Prove first that 10 paired schools finish a sprint with at least 80% of teams submitting, and that half the private schools pay for a second one.
Plan for roughly ₹35–70 L. The software can start simple, so most of it goes into coordinators, moderation and teacher support.
No licence, but you need written approval from each school, verifiable parental consent under the DPDP Rules and a proper safeguarding policy.
Yes, and pairing schools within one country keeps timetables aligned. Check local child-protection law and your own data protection rules first.
The free Twinclass validation kit has the line-by-line capital breakdown, the effort scoring, the child-safety and consent checklist, a 14-day validation sprint with pass/fail targets, a 90-day launch plan, 10 interview questions for principals and teachers, and 5 assumptions to test. Download the kit →
Thinking about building Twinclass or something close to it? The make-or-break work is keeping paired schools in step for six weeks while keeping every child safe, and I'm happy to help you plan for both. If you need a hand, you know where to find me. Talk to Yash →
For illustration only. Names are fictional and ideas hypothetical; sourced facts are real but may be out of date. Nothing here is legal, financial or professional advice, and Yash Khatri is not personally liable for any use of it. Read the full disclaimer.